Click on the play button to here the message and responses.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
About the Blogger
- S. Olmstead
- I'm just another simple, small man in God's big world. I exist to glorify the Lord, though I admit, I fail frequently. I am a slave to Christ first, a husband to my best friend second, and an artist third. I rejoice in a reliance that is built upon someone that is so much bigger than myself. The psalmist says it best, "I call as my heart grows faint; lead me to the rock that is higher than I." (Psalm 61:2) I currently work as a production artist/graphic designer at a local, Christian non-profit organization located in Phoenix, Arizona.
1 comment:
I don't have your phone number so I'm not able to participate in your silly debate, but "David" is so wrong. The question wasn't about which was the better book, but which was the better movie series. And as much as I've heard that "The Lord of the Rings" is allegorical, I just don't see it. "Star Wars" (Episode IV: A New Hope) changed moviemaking forever...good or bad, it did. That's something LOTR did not do. Is the original trilogy flawed? Certainly. Is it cheesy? Delightfully. Maybe if Frodo had flown an X-Wing, he could have reached Mount Doom a lot more quickly and the whole bloody mess could have been cut down to less than 90 minutes.
Post a Comment